CLAIRE FERCHAUD
1896-1972

 

I.

The Supreme Call of the Sacred Heart in Loublande :

The Perpetual Mass for the salvation of mankind

 

“The buried message of Loublande must be unearthed  for the salvation of the world. For 50 years or more, the descent has been dizzy  and all attempts to rise are in vain.

Lord, let Your Voice be heard like thunder and, on our foreheads bowed in repentance, Your Anger will be changed into Mercy.” (Claire Ferchaud, 31st March 1970)

 

Claire Ferchaud was born on the 5th of May 1896 (Feast day of St Pius V, the Pope who codified the Mass bearing his name) in a rural family of tenant farmers running the farm called “Les Rinfillières”, situated in the parish of Le Puy-Saint-Bonnet, between Cholet and Saint-Laurent-sur-Sèvre, in the heartland of the “Vendée Militaire” (this is the name given to the territory which fiercely opposed with armed resistance the French Revolution in 1793). The Annals of the “Souvenir Vendéen” (Vendée’s Memoirs) have kept the historical records on this farmhouse, where during the Revolution a non-jurist priest would hide in order to escape the massacres of the Infernal Columns (the name given by the brave Vendee people to the murderous anti-Catholic revolutionary armies).

According to the Autobiographical Notes [1] that she wrote later in obedience to her confessors, it is in this environment that Claire, from a very early age was graced with Apparitions of  the  Child  Jesus,  who  came  to educate  her  in  acquiring a sense of self-sacrifice  and  the  acceptance  of  suffering.  Then during the Great War in 1914, He will manifest Himself as The Lord Christ bruised by the sins of men and pierced with a deep wound, “which”, He declared “had been inflicted upon Him by France”.

First mission : the Emblem of the Sacred Heart on the Flag

From then on, we may gather that according to God’s Plan the education that she received from the Lord Himself had been designed for a mission. While her  family, like so many other French families must contribute to the fight in the War, and the Western region of France is providing full-size regiments (thus perpetuating the tradition of Catholic patriotic fervor, typical of the Vendee region), and while her two brothers are on the War front, Claire is summoned by Our Lord to meet in Paris the President of the French Republic, Raymond Poincaré, in order to  fulfill at long last the ancient promises contained in the Message that had been sent by Saint Margaret-Mary to King Louis XIV, and then relayed by Cardinal Pie to Napoléon the Third, on behalf of Madame Royer : it consisted in placing the Image of  the Sacred Heart on the French flag, and more generally on the flags of the Allied nations. As a reward for this act of faith, France would defeat not only the traitors destroying her from within, but also the invading Prussians, and above all « the enemies of our souls » (sic) – this is the expression used by Claire when referring to Free Masonry and its relentless struggle against the Church.

From a historical point of view, there is no novelty in the requests and the promises of the Sacred Heart, except that they are being reiterated after the period of the Monarchy and that of the Empire, under the sectarian régime of the Third Republic, which had exiled from France the Religious Orders and had unilaterally imposed, in 1905, the law of Separation between Church and State, in defiance of Pope Saint Pius X.  On the other hand, in compliance with a National Vow drawing its inspiration from the ordeals suffered by Pope Pius IX in Rome and the disastrous defeat of their army at Sedan (in 1870), the French had tried to rekindle their courage, bringing to fruition the plan  already set out in another request by Margaret-Mary : the construction of the Basilica of the Sacred-Heart in Montmartre, which would be completed and finalized only after the 14-18 conflict.

Claire Ferchaud’s mission occurs at a time, one can easily imagine, in a context of heightened anticlerical policy that had become far more stubborn and vicious than anything the previous messengers could have been confronted with.

Nevertheless, enjoying full support from Mgr Humbrecht, her Bishop, Claire was instructed to submit herself for examination by a commission of theologians in Poitiers, and by Abbé Audebert, parish priest of Loublande, the village where she attended Mass and where she used to go to school as a child.

So, on January 1st 1917, Claire wrote a letter to President Poincaré, commenting on the great misfortunes that befell France, and recalling the demands and promises of the Sacred Heart. In this letter, she also unveiled a secret relating to his private life that only the President himself could be aware of. At that time she was twenty years old.

Her letter was handed over to the President by M. Baudry d’Asson, member of Parliament for the District of Vendée.

In her writings Claire described her journey to Paris, the half-hearted welcome – to say the least – that she received from Cardinal Archbishop Amette (he appeared to be, alongside  Card. Billot, part of a small but influential minority among French bishops : those who were the main opponents of the Flag of the Sacred Heart) ;  she recalls the priests and the theologians that she met on that occasion, her nighttime worship in the Basilica of Montmartre where the Great Host of the monstrance appeared to her torn by the same wound that she had seen on the Bruised Heart of Jesus at Rinfillières; then she recounts her moving encounter with Raymond Poincaré at the Elysée Palace, the President’s objections, but also his troubled mind when he contemplated the image of the Sacred Heart that she had uncovered in front of him; and she mentions at last the promise that he made to her, including his final heartening words when he saw her to the door: « You have done your duty as a noble Frenchwoman ! »

  The second mission : the ways of atonement

At this stage, we ought to dwell upon the night that she spent in Montmartre (from the15th to the 16th of March 2017),  which took place before her encounter with Poincaré (on March 21), because it is during these hours dedicated to Eucharistic Adoration that she grasped the full meaning of her second mission : the need to atone for what all French political regimes have done – be it the Monarchy, the Empire, or the Republic –, when they rejected, each in its own way, the act of Faith demanded by the Sacred Heart. Indeed Claire distinctly heard those words by the Saviour :

« My hour has not yet come, because the time of trial for you is not yet spent; know that you must suffer deeply for My glory. The greater the contradictions, the more you are bound to trust in the final success and the triumph of My Heart. »

The consequence is clear: while she was being entrusted by the Saviour with the mission of an apostle, He Himself impressed upon her soul the awesome idea that she would meet with failure!  For, even though she was wholeheartedly dedicated to winning over Poincaré to a sacred cause, we must point out the contradiction which will leave in her mind, till the end of her life, the trace of deep and lasting sufferings. These would increase in a crescendo, so that her life was nothing but a focal point of contradictions, of « purely opposing forces », she used to say.

As was to be expected, Poincaré did not intervene. Back in her native Vendée, Claire wrote to him once again, in order to remind him of his promises; likewise she sent a letter to the fourteen generals of the High Military Command, and this was all the more relevant as the government was hunting down the thousands of pennants and flags of the Sacred Heart that were displayed and worn on the front; while, on the other hand, what she had predicted became true: ministers, journalists, and other personalities would be indicted by Military Justice for treason in time of war!

These circumstances may have played a part in Marshall Foch’s decision (inspired by the Chaplain of the Headquarters) to privately consecrate, in his own personal capacity, the French and Allied troops to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, on the eve of his famous counter-offensive dated July 1918, which enabled France, within four months, to win a war that had been dragging on for four years! Meanwhile, it should be remembered that whole crowds had been gathering in prayer in Loublande for the success of Marshall Foch; but being established on shaky foundations, the peace that followed the war was described by Claire Ferchaud as a mere “ truce » … and the same could be said in 1945…

In the freezing night of Christmas 1917, Claire had received permission from her bishop to start – together with a few female companions – a fellowship of “victimes expiatrices” (victims of Reparation) in the workroom that belonged to the Parish of Loublande: a place that was extended and became a convent, whose chapel was open to the public and consecrated by the Bishop, Mgr Humbrecht, on June 12 1918. Since that day, the Blessed Sacrament has always been kept in the Chapel.

The decree of 1920:

On March 12 1920, two years after the Great War, while her bishop and the priest of her parish were being swiftly removed from their post by the Holy See, a decree was issued by the Holy Office and ratified by Pope Benedict XV, stating: « The alleged visions, revelations, prophecies, etc., commonly referred to as ‘the facts pertaining to Loublande’, including the writings related to these, cannot be approved (latin: ‘probari non posse’) ».

Although her name was not mentioned, Claire was notified of the content. Steeped in a spirit of Reparation, she took upon herself the burden of the decree as the main cross of her life:

            « My Cross, my immense Cross, is there, she exclaimed. From now on, it is this cross, stretching out both arms, which will declare my love of the Church! ». Thus, it was not for France alone, but for the Church as well that Claire Ferchaud had come into this world.

The third mission : The Perpetual Mass

Except for a few priests close to her, no one knew that Claire would soon reveal « the soul of her soul », « another message richer in hope than the first one » - as she would say. This corresponds, therefore, to the third mission that she had come to realize since the days of her childhood, when at the age of 5, 11, and 14, during the period when she was looking after the lambs, she had caught sight, on the highest hill at Rinfillières, of a boundless Cross reaching out to the sky: its base consisted of four altars, erected at the four cardinal points, where priests appeared succeeding one another - night and day - for the celebration of Holy Mass!

She confidentially explained the meaning of this revelation - in the year 1922 - to Reverend Father Lémius, Rector of the Basilica of the Sacred-Heart in Montmartre, and to her second bishop, Mgr de Durfort, who had pleaded her cause when he met Pope Benedict XV, so as to counter the harmful impact of the 1920 decree on crowds easily swayed by contrary opinions (« a mountain of mud was poured on Claire»: this is what a prelate of the Vatican, Cardinal Philippe, would not hesitate to say in those days).

Mgr de Durfort was able to obtain from Holy Father that Claire’s community should be permitted to live on undisturbed. Moreover, in the same year 1922, the Pope, who may have been urged by a feeling of remorse, wished to receive Claire at the Vatican… but he died very suddenly when she was just about to leave for Rome!

Mgr de Durfort kept on supporting Claire under the Pontificate of Pius XI. He allowed her to go to Rome in 1925, where she was received at the Holy Office by Cardinal Merry del Val. Alluding to the 1920 decree, the prelate made to her this confession: « No, my child, you are not condemned, politics has been meddling with it all ! ».  Clear-sighted minds were in no doubt that this had been the case, in view of the fact that diplomatic relations between the Holy See and Paris had been resumed in 1920, the same year when the decree was issued ! In other words, Claire Ferchaud and the Message of the Sacred Heart had been sacrificed on the altar of politics ! [2]

In spite of all, Rome did not relinquish the social doctrine of Christ the King. Pope Pius XI delivered his famous Encyclical « Quas Primas » and pronounced, in the face of mounting perils, his solemn condemnations of nazism and communism. On a supernatural level, the triduum of Masses that he instituted in  Lourdes, in the year 1935 - with the hope of warding off the evils of two deadly ideologies -,  evinced striking affinities with the Perpetual Mass: the means of salvation  that had been demanded by Claire Ferchaud at Rinfillières. In her eyes, the Lourdes triduum was « a stepping stone for the future».

The Second World War

In 1940, politics would once more interfere! As the second World War was likely to revive memories of Claire Ferchaud’s  first mission, the convent chapel was closed to the public by her  3rd bishop, Mgr Mesguen, for the alleged reason: « disobedience » ! As a result, the refugees who were flocking in great numbers in Loublande, no longer enjoyed from the clergy the same support that the crowds had received during the Great War, and they were unable to pray in the chapel, even for the sake of peace! And yet, it is in those circumstances that a miracle took place:  the multiplication of loaves of bread by the hands of Claire Ferchaud for the benefit of a troop of starving soldiers, when our army was being routed by the Germans… Such was God’s Reply in His Mercy…

One had to wait till the end of the war and the advent of  the nuclear weapon to see General de Lattre de Tassigny intervene  and obtain from Pope Pius XII that Claire Ferchaud’s requests be taken into consideration more seriously, so that everything should be implemented for the institution of the Perpetual Mass at Rinfillières. Fully aware of the political and diplomatic opposition roused by the issue of the Flag of the Sacred Heart, this Pontiff recommended that « the facts which belong to the past in relation to Loublande » be set aside, and that efforts focus exclusively on the sheer spiritual implementation of the Perpetual Mass, for the sake of securing the true peace: that of Our Lord, the Saviour.

Unfortunately, at a time when the world was experiencing the division between East and West, the so called « balance of terror » or « cold war », the enslavement of entire populations, the gulags, the protracted bloodthirsty conflicts in the colonies, the millions of dead that the aftermaths of the War held in store for us (a situation getting worse day after day, thus contradicting the false prophets who herald a “man-made peace”),  the same bishop who had been responsible for the closing down of the chapel was more than ever unshakeable in his clinging to the 1920 decree. According to him, the two messages – centering on the Flag of the Sacred Heart and on the Perpetual Mass – had their origins in the same person; so the Holy See could not “disapprove” of one, and “approve” the other: this would be regarded by public opinion (and by the government) as a « step backward ! » (sic). One may guess the consequences of this attitude: the disillusionment, the sudden turnabouts and the betrayals (we shall not mention them here) that resulted from this thwarting of the Pope’s designs, and the renewed sufferings inflicted on Claire Ferchaud!

Summarizing this period, the lines that she wrote - in 1959 - are worth pondering:

Why were there these two aspects of a Mission which apparently seemed contradictory?  Why at a certain time did I come in the forefront before being thrown ~ immediately after ~ into a state of utter dereliction, when the Good Lord knew that I would meet with a setback? If there had not been this question of the Flag of the Sacred Heart, the more important one of the institution of the Perpetual Mass would have quickly taken off, without being exposed to all this turmoil which put the Masonic sect on a war footing. (…) and the last forty years would not have been drowned in the rivers of blood of continual wars.”

The Council

In the years following the Pontificate of John XXIII (a pope who had worked for the institution of the Perpetual Mass when he was  apostolic Nuncio in Paris), we are confronted with a situation which — from a religious point of view — is inevitably worsening. Although less aggressive than militant forms of secularism, the secular basis of our society is by and large paving the way for a process of dechristianization.

The aftermaths of the pastoral Vatican Council (II) make plain the rift developing within the clergy, the degeneration of morals and manners, which is undermining our contemporary societies and weakening their capacity for standing up to the newly evolving surge of barbaric cruelty.     Anticipating these self-destructive developments, the Holy Office will respond under the authority of his pro-prefect, cardinal Ottaviani, summoning Mgr Vion — Claire’s fourth bishop — to reopen the chapel of Loublande to the public, on July 1st 1964, the Feast Day of the Precious Blood! An intervention which caused great displeasure to the bishop! Nevertheless, in a letter that was sent to Claire Ferchaud by Substitute Dell’Acqua on behalf of Pope Paul VI (dated January 28 1966), the Secretariat of State praised her virtues which he called « an asset in the treasure of the Church » (“un acquis au trésor de l’Église” /sic), declaring that the Holy Father “had joyfully agreed” to the reopening of the chapel ! This sanctuary, which for 24 years had been a diocesan chapel, was now assuming papal dignity!

However the new type of theology advocated by the Council — based on religious freedom, ecumenism, openness to the world, interfaith dialogue — would incline Paul VI to declare the Perpetual Mass « untimely » (in spite of the fact that he too had played a part - in his capacity as Substitute for the Secretariat of State under Pius XII – in trying to institute the Perpetual Mass).

Although this Pope had acknowledged that « the smoke of Satan had entered the temple of God », and that what is regarded as untimely today may well appear timely at a later stage, Cardinal Dell’Acqua felt the need, in a second letter, to require from Claire an act of “definitive renunciation”.

It was precisely in this context that the 1969 liturgical reform turned its back – at least for some time - on the « untouched rite »: the one, according to Claire, which must prevail in the celebration of the Perpetual Mass. (From a letter dated 29 January 1971 to Cardinal Ottaviani).

« To impose a sacrifice on a humble woman — wrote Claire Ferchaud — is nothing in itself. What really matters is a world being sacrificed by the denial of this tribute to God.

In the very word « definitive » is enclosed for me the « consummatum est » of a protracted agony affecting at once body and soul. Hanging on the wood of the Tree, Jesus was aware of the comforting presence of His mother and of John standing at the foot of the Cross… In the Holy City, at the heart of Christendom, will there be a soul capable of hearing this ultimate sigh of mine, lasting till the Day dawns that will  dispel the gloom by which I feel oppressed, just as the world is suffocating under this gloom ? I have always been obedient, without spinning stories about « victory »; I will obey once again, « obediens usque ad mortem », on this earth soaked with the blood of wars, an earth shaken in its very foundations. »

Upon these words, Claire Ferchaud died on January 29 1972.

People believed that the fall of the Berlin Wall, the collapse of the Soviet bloc under the Pontificate of John-Paul II would  vouchsafe an enduring peace, but we are witnessing rather the opposite:

The rise of Islamic fundamentalism, the many-sided threat of terrorism, the persecutions against Christians of the East (and soon against those in the West), the multiplying hotbeds of war, the illegal proliferation of all kinds of weapons (including nuclear ones), the migration of entire populations, the economic crises, the enslavement of nations subjected to the power of inter-national finance, let alone the ravages caused by so-called natural catastrophes, the anti-life laws, perversions of every sort, plus the destruction of the family cell, which is the core of human society. One cannot but shudder on reading these lines by Claire:

“I would like to spare the Earth those great evils, which could be compared to the destruction of men after the flood ... but what could I obtain???  Merely an extension of the Divine Patience of God, for I feel that this scorned Divine Love needs to be avenged.”

Have we come close to the End of the world? Is our planet on the brink of explosion? Will mankind perish in the throes of despair and chaos?

Showing His Heart, Our Lord said:

            « This deep wound was inflicted on me by France ! ».

            Had not the Wound grown deeper after the Roman Decree of 1920?

            Claire will have these words:

“The Sovereign Lord, for the second time in human history, comes up against man’s rebellion, His Merciful Plan destroyed, and it is then that God decrees the chastisement which will plunge nations into a dark chaos.”

“Yet, God remains good”! Thanks to the « motu proprio » of July 2007 issued by Pope Benedict XVI, offering a new lease of life to the timeless Holy Mass, a light has been rekindled in Heaven, because the Holy Spirit is still at work:

So let us listen to Claire once again:

            “…Yet, God remains good, and just as He promised a Saviour to Adam who had fallen because of his sin, so now from the depth of the darkness which enfolds humanity like a shroud, God does not withdraw without outlining another plan, richer in hope than the first one. This is the way He will avenge His Honour and show a greater Love … »

She writes about her sacrifice and that of her companions, and she describes « The Great Promise », the graces of renewal and forgiveness pouring out from the celebration of the Perpetual Mass:

            “The Mass of unsurpassed sublimity will pour out on the world the whole redemptive value of Christ the Saviour.

            “It is the Mass that puts man back into Divine sonship, restores weakened institutions and strengthens the shaky pillars of the Church.

            “The Mass is today the only way in, to open the floodgates of Divine Mercy.

            It is the Mass that pays the full debt of men!” 

Conclusion

Our concluding words will be those of Reverend Father Albert Hus, Ex-Superior of the Montfortian Community at Saint-Laurent-sur-Sèvre, who had served for 37 years as Chaplain of Claire Ferchaud’s Convent.

This is what he wrote on the 11th of February 1986, Feast Day of Notre-Dame de Lourdes:

 

            « To abandon this Work, on account of certain difficulties (a euphemistic way of putting it!), would amount to a way of betraying the Fathers who came before us. It would even be — somehow — the betrayal of our duty towards the Church who has been deceived…”

« At the present moment, is not the Church in need of a new and powerful supernatural remedy? »

Whether we like it or not, mankind as a whole is caught in a vortex of events of apocalyptic dimension, due to man’s immeasurable pride rising up against the Love of His Creator. But is it true or not that Jesus gave Himself up to His Father for our Redemption? Is it true or not that, in the course of two thousand years, the Holy Sacrifice of Mass has proved to be the powerful and efficacious means of renewing the face of the earth and opening up for us the Path to Heaven ? Is man now pretending to tear away from his heart the grace of God’s Mercy, by returning to Satan’s fold?

Speaking through His servant, Claire, how many times did the Heart of Jesus issue His warnings, so as to touch man’s heart! How many times did He show His Wound!

And how deeply was Claire’s spirit communing with this Wound, in an attempt to stem the rising tide of Evil!

No, it shall not be said that France and the Church cannot recover! Provided we respond to the act of faith demanded by the Lord, the means of salvation is there, within our reach:

The Perpetual Mass, a deluge of special graces pouring out from this solemn revival of the Redemption; and this “Priestly Work” which is “The Work of the Lamb” opens the Gate to man’s survival, to the realization of God’s Will on earth and in Heaven, and to the Advent of Christ The King in our hearts, in our laws, in our institutions! In union with the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the Reign of Our Lord will shine upon the newly converted nations of the Earth!

Claude Mouton-Raimbault March 2017.

***

Claude Mouton-Raimbault is most successful in retracing and encompassing – within nine dense pages - the major developments in Claire Ferchaud’s mission, and in shedding a powerful light on its scope for our time – while drawing our attention to details and circumstances always in keeping with the basic theme. These pages are translated from the text which appeared in the n°71 issue of the French periodical ‘Lecture et Tradition’ (pages 18 to 26) of ‘Les Editions de Chiré-en-Montreuil’ (March 2017).

We signal to the readers the most important books published by Claude Mouton:

- Le Moyen du Salut. Introduction au Message de Loublande (Ed. de Chiré, 1974)

- Au plus fort de la tourmente … Claire Ferchaud (Ed. Résiac, 1979)

- Et Jésus modela son âme … Claire Ferchaud (Ed. Résiac, 1981)

- Ils regarderont vers Celui qu’ils ont transpercé (Ed. Résiac, 1983)

- Pour l’honneur de Claire (Ed. Résiac, 1995).

- Présence de Claire Ferchaud. Réfutation d’un livre trompeur. (Ed. de Chiré, 2007)

- Vers la lumière (Poèmes, autoédition).


[1] - Ed. Pierre Téqui, 1974.
[2] Clearly stated in ‘Claire des Rinfillières’ (Ed. Téqui, 1998) : Note 1, p. 215.

   

pour toute suggestion ou demande d'informations